If you like articles from The Big Con, hit the like button, subscribe, comment, and recommend us in your Substack recommendations. It really helps get the newsletter to more people.
Gavin Newsom’s latest political pirouette has Democrats clutching their pearls, and it’s easy to see why: the man’s moving at warp speed. One day, he’s the progressive pitbull locking horns with Ron DeSantis on Fox News in November 2023 with fiery personal attacks, calling DeSantis “weak, pathetic, and small.” The next, it’s early 2025, and he’s sipping coffee with Charlie Kirk and Steve Bannon on his podcast, decrying transgender athletes in women’s sports as “deeply unjust” and plotting a charm offensive across Fox News, conservative radio, and podcasts to sell a new vision for America.
This isn’t a leisurely stroll to the center—it’s a sprint in under 18 months. Bud Light pulled a similar high-speed pivot with Dylan Mulvaney, ditching its party-animal roots in a heartbeat, and both cases scream the same truth: shift too fast without showing your work, and you risk losing your base without winning the crowd you’re chasing.
Newsom’s party is in full meltdown mode over this. The guy who built his brand as California’s liberal lodestar—championing climate crusades, sanctuary cities, and LGBTQ+ rights—is now hobnobbing with the right’s loudest megaphones. During that 2023 DeSantis debate, he was defending SB 107’s provision letting California courts claim emergency jurisdiction for kids seeking gender-affirming care banned elsewhere. He blasted DeSantis for “attacking minorities” and oozed moral clarity.
Now, he’s flipping the script, staking out a stance on transgender athletes that’d make his old self choke on his kombucha. His plan? Storm conservative media, dismantle GOP talking points, and redirect the culture war conversations—hoping to snag moderates and independents fed up with partisan trench warfare.
The shift is so swift it’s giving whiplash. Democrats are freaking out because it feels like a gut punch to their core values—or at least the Newsom they thought they knew. He’s betting this pivot will broaden his appeal, painting him as a pragmatic unifier who can bridge America’s red-blue divide, maybe with an eye on 2028.
But there’s a massive catch: moderates and independents, the very folks he’s courting, might not buy it. A polished politician like Newsom, flipping this hard this fast, risks looking less like a principled evolve and more like a slick opportunist. If he doesn’t slow down and pace this shift—letting his openly stated views evolve with clarity—he could end up like Bud Light: shedding 30% of his Democratic base while failing to reel in the swing voters he’s after. In fact, Newsom's favorability rating fell to 47 percent, with his net favorability score dropping to minus 6 points.
Bud Light’s story is the cautionary tale Newsom should be studying. Back in 1981, Budweiser launched Bud Light to snag a younger crowd, trading the stately Clydesdales for Spuds MacKenzie—a bull terrier rocking sunglasses and a Hawaiian shirt. Spuds was the ultimate party animal, and it worked: sales soared 21% in the first full year, cementing Bud Light as the beer for good-time guys. For decades, it owned that frat-boy, tailgate vibe—unapologetic, loud, and proudly unpretentious. By 2023, though, that image felt like a straitjacket. The brand wanted to shed its party-animal skin and grab a broader, more inclusive audience. Enter Dylan Mulvaney, a transgender influencer with 1.8 million Instagram followers, tapped for a March Madness promo in April 2023. One breezy, sub-minute video tied to a $15,000 contest, and Bud Light thought it could leap into a new era.
It didn’t land—it crashed. The pivot was so abrupt, so devoid of buildup, that it blindsided everyone. No warning, no bridge from Spuds’ keg-stand legacy to this new vibe—just a hard cut. Conservative drinkers, the brand’s bread and butter, felt betrayed; cans got smashed, boycotts flared, and country stars like Kid Rock made a spectacle of it. Liberals, meanwhile, rolled their eyes at what looked like clumsy pandering. Sales didn’t just dip—they plummeted 30% in weeks. By May 2023, Modelo Especial had snatched the top beer spot in the U.S., a throne Bud Light hasn’t reclaimed. Shelf space shrank, layoffs hit, and retailers like Target got tangled in the mess. All because Bud Light shifted too fast, too quietly, from its party-animal core without prepping its faithful.
Newsom is in a similar bind. His Democratic base—urban liberals, activists, coastal elites—loved the old Gavin: who stared down red-state governors and wore progressivism like a badge. Now, he’s questioning where “LatinX” came from and claims he was only in one meeting where people stated their preferred pronouns.
Newsome is courting conservatives, hoping to lure moderates and independents who crave a less dogmatic leader. But if he keeps barreling ahead without pacing this evolution—without openly walking voters through why he’s rethinking old stances—he’s flirting with Bud Light’s fate. Imagine losing 30% of Democrats—the diehards who knock on doors and write checks—because they see a flip-flopper, not a fighter. Then picture moderates and independents, already wary of polished politicians, agree with DeSantis that Newsome is a “slick, slippery politician.” Just an inauthentic Sacramento slickster chasing the next big wave. He could be left with neither camp, bleeding support on one end and gaining nothing on the other.
Bud Light’s aftermath shows the worst-case scenario. After the Mulvaney fallout, Anheuser-Busch flailed. Their first response—a tepid “we bring people together over a beer” statement—landed like a wet rag. Weeks later, they launched a listening tour, uncovering what customers wanted: beer without debates, a focus on sports and music, a return to roots. Too late. The trust was torched, and rebuilding the brand has been a slog—years of consistent, authentic moves to claw back what they lost.
Newsom’s got a shot to avoid that abyss. He’s out there, loud and proud—sitting with Kirk and Bannon, planning his Fox News run, owning the shift even if it ruffles feathers. Transparency’s his edge; he’s not hiding the pivot, just betting the execution sells itself.
But speed’s the killer. Bud Light didn’t ease off the gas—they floored it into a new lane and hit a wall. Newsom’s doing the same if he doesn’t slow his roll. Take his transgender athlete stance: going from “sanctuary for trans kids” to “unjust in sports” needs more than a podcast quip. The transformation demands a story—the why—a thread voters can follow.
The Democrat base might forgive a gradual rethink. Moderates might warm to a candid journey. Bolt ahead without it, and he’s risking that 30% drop—alienating his base while independents shrug. Bud Light thought a quick rebrand would widen their tent; it shrank it instead. Newsom thinks a fast pivot will broaden his coalition; it could leave him stranded.
Both prove the same point: rapid shifts can work, but only if you bring people along. Newsom’s still in play—his apparent open-mindedness might just thread the needle. However, doing so inauthentically will leave Democrats howling and swing voters refusing to bite. Bud Light is still licking its wounds, a reminder of what happens when you don’t respect your devotees. For Newsom, time will be the judge—will he pace it right, or crash like a beer can under a boot?
Share this post